Journal of Hematology, ISSN 1927-1212 print, 1927-1220 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, J Hematol and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website https://jh.elmerpub.com

Original Article

Volume 15, Number 4, August 2026, pages 179-187


The Impact of Induction With Azacitidine and Venetoclax Versus Intensive Chemotherapy on Outcomes After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Figure

↓  Figure 1. Kaplan–Meier estimates of overall survival in the intensive chemotherapy versus azacitidine-venetoclax cohorts (P = 0.7).
Figure 1.

Tables

↓  Table 1. Patient Characteristics of the Intensive Chemotherapy Versus Azacitidine-Venetoclax Cohorts
 
Patient characteristicsIntensive chemotherapy (N = 17)Azacitidine-venetoclax (N = 14)P-value
HCT-CI: Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Comorbidity Index.
Gender0.55
  Female9 (53%)5 (36%)
  Male8 (47%)9 (64%)
Age at transplant, median (range) years63 (54–66)67 (61–69)0.13
Karnofsky Performance status0.7
  90% or greater4 (24%)2 (14%)
  Less than 90%13 (76%)12 (86%)
HCT-CI0.7
  Less than 314 (82%)10 (71%)
  3 or more3 (18%)4 (29%)
Acute myeloid leukemia type0.15
  De novo16 (94%)10 (71%)
  Secondary1 (6%)4 (29%)
European Leukemia Network risk0.001
  Adverse7 (41%)13 (93%)
  Intermediate9 (53%)0 (0%)
  Favorable1 (6%)1 (7%)
Disease Risk Index0.02
  Very high0 (0%)4 (29%)
  High15 (88%)10 (71%)
  Intermediate2 (12%)0 (0%)
Minimal residual disease at transplant0.4
  Yes4 (24%)6 (43%)
  No13 (76%)8 (57%)
Transplant conditioning intensity0.2
  Myeloablative3 (18%)0 (0%)
  Reduced intensity14 (82%)14 (100%)
Donor type0.4
  Matched unrelated9 (53%)8 (57%)
  Mismatch unrelated1 (6%)3 (21.5%)
  Haploidentical4 (23.5%)3 (21.5%)
  Matched related3 (17.5%)0 (0%)

 

↓  Table 2. Outcomes of Allogeneic Stem-Cell Transplantation in the Intensive Chemotherapy Versus Azacitidine-Venetoclax Cohorts
 
Outcome after stem-cell transplantIntensive chemotherapyAzacitidine-venetoclaxP-value
CR: complete remission; MRD: minimal residual disease.
Complete remission at day 100 posttransplant0.7
  CR/MRD negative12 (71%)12 (86%)
  CR/MRD positive2 (12%)1 (7%)
  Relapsed/deceased3 (17%)1 (7%)
Acute graft-versus-host disease0.6
  Grade 04 (23.5%)6 (43%)
  Grade I–II9 (53%)6 (43%)
  Grade III–IV4 (23.5%)2 (14%)
Chronic graft-versus-host disease0.2
  None7 (41%)11 (79%)
  Limited5 (29%)1 (7%)
  Extensive3 (18%)1 (7%)
  Deceased2 (12%)1 (7%)
Relapse> 0.9
  Yes3 (18%)3 (21%)
  No14 (82%)11 (79%)
Deceased> 0.9
  Yes4 (24%)4 (29%)
  No13 (76%)10 (71%)

 

↓  Table 3. Summary of 1-Year Estimates of Outcomes After Allogeneic Stem-Cell Transplantation in Intensive Chemotherapy Versus Azacitidine-Venetoclax Cohorts
 
Estimate at 1-yearIntensive chemotherapyAzacitidine-venetoclaxP value
CI: confidence interval; GVHD: graft-versus-host disease; GRFS: GVHD-free, relapse-free survival.
Overall survival (95% CI)75% (56.5–99.5)69.2% (48.2–99.5)0.73
Relapse-free survival (95% CI)64.7% (45.5–91.9)57.1% (36.3–89.9)0.67
Cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality (%)23.528.50.76
Cumulative incidence of relapse (%)11.814.30.84
Cumulative incidence of acute GVHD II–IV (%)23.535.70.48
Cumulative incidence of acute GVHD III–IV (%)5.914.30.46
Cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD (%)11.87.10.67
GRFS (95% CI)64.7% (45.5–91.9)57.1% (36.3–89.9)0.67