Journal of Hematology, ISSN 1927-1212 print, 1927-1220 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, J Hematol and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website https://jh.elmerpub.com

Original Article

Volume 15, Number 4, August 2026, pages 198-213


Could the Immune Modulation of Invariant Natural Killer T Cell and the Expression of CD244 and CD196 on Natural Killer Cell Subtypes Impact the Treatment Outcomes of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients?

Figures

↓  Figure 1. Flow cytometric detection of lymphocytes, NK cells, NKT cells, and their expression of CD196 and CD244. (a) Forward scatter area and height to define singlets and exclude duplicates. (b) Forward and side scatter dot plot was used to define lymphocyte population. (c) The expression of CD3 on lymphocyte population to detect CD3+ and CD3 lymphocytes. (d) The expression of CD16 and CD56 on CD3+ lymphocyte population to detect CD3+CD16+CD56+ NKT cells. (e) The expression of CD196 and CD244 on CD3+CD16+CD56+ NKT cells. (f) The expression of CD16 and CD56 on CD3 population to detect different NK cell subtypes according to the positivity or negativity, dimness, or brightness of CD16 and CD56. (g) The expression of CD196 and CD244 on CD3CD16+brightCD56+bright NK cells. (h) The expression of CD196 and CD244 on CD3CD16+brightCD56+dim NK cells. (i) The expression of CD196 and CD244 on CD3CD16+dimCD56+dim NK cells. (j) The expression of CD196 and CD244 on CD3CD16+dimCD56+bright NK cells. (k) The expression of CD196 and CD244 on total CD3CD16+CD56+ NK cells. (l) The expression of CD196 and CD244 on CD3CD16+CD56 population. (m) The expression of CD196 and CD244 on CD3CD16CD56+ population.
Figure 1.
↓  Figure 2. Differential expressions of CD244 and CD196 on CD3+CD56+CD16+ cells between AML patients and healthy controls, Mann–Whitney test.
Figure 2.
↓  Figure 3. Differential expression of CD244 and CD196 on CD56brightCDbright cells between patients and controls.
Figure 3.
↓  Figure 4. Differential expression of CD16brightCD56dim between patients and controls with CD244 and CD196 expression.
Figure 4.
↓  Figure 5. Differential expression of CD3CD16+CD56 subpopulations between patients and controls.
Figure 5.
↓  Figure 6. Differential expression of CD3CD16CD56+ subpopulations between patients and controls.
Figure 6.
↓  Figure 7. (a) Differential expression of NKT subpopulations according to remission. (b) Differential expression of NK subpopulations. (c) Differential expression of CD244 and CD196 on NK subpopulations. (d) Differential expression of CD16 and CD56 on NK cells according to remission.
Figure 7.
↓  Figure 8. Differential expression of immune cells according to cytogenetics.
Figure 8.

Tables

↓  Table 1. Demographic Data of Study Population
 
DemographicPatients (n = 26)Controls (n = 24)P-value
Data are expressed as mean ± SD, median, number, and percentages. aMann–Whitney test. bFisher’s exact test. P ≤ 0.05 is considered significant. SD: standard deviation.
Agea0.6
  Mean ± SD45.5 ± 18.147.6 ± 6.7
  Median46 years47 years
Sexb0.7
  Male (n = 31)17 (54.8%)14 (45.2%)
  Female (n = 19)9 (47.4%)10 (52.6%)

 

↓  Table 2. Laboratory Characteristics of AML Patients
 
CharacteristicsDescriptive
Data are expressed as mean ± SD, numbers, and percentages. AML: acute myelocytic leukemia; CRP: C-reactive protein; DIC: disseminated intravascular coagulation; Hb: hemoglobin; LDH: lactate dehydrogenase; SD: standard deviation; WBC: white blood cell.
Hb (mean ± SD)8.1 ± 1.4
WBCs (mean ± SD)74.9 ± 77.5
Lymphocytic count (mean ± SD)15.9 ± 6.1
Neutrophilic count (mean ± SD)24.3 ± 13.1
Platelet count (mean ± SD)48.14 ± 38.8
LDH (mean ± SD)929.3 ± 735.6
Uric acid (mean ± SD)9.6 ± 4.8
Serum ferritin (mean ± SD)606.1 ± 643.04
CRP (mean ± SD)46.4 ± 54.8
Peripheral blasts % (mean ± SD)52.9 ± 19.5
BM blasts % (mean ± SD)57.7 ± 19.8
Impaired liver function10 (38.5%)
Raised renal function6 (23.1%)
DIC, %4 (15.4%)
Decreased fibrinogen level, %6 (23.1%)
Raised D-dimer, %5 (19.2%)
Impaired coagulation, %5 (19.2%)

 

↓  Table 3. AML Types, Cytogenetics, Molecular Genetics, and Risk Groups
 
CharacteristicsFrequencies
Data are expressed as numbers and percentages. AML: acute myelocytic leukemia; FAB: French-American-British.
AML type
  Primary23 (88.5%)
  Secondary3 (11.5%)
FAB types
  M12 (7.7%)
  M21 (3.8%)
  M1/M24 (15.4%)
  M42 (7.7%)
  M4/M514 (53.8%)
  M53 (11.5%)
Cytogenetics
  Favorable12 (46.2%)
  Unfavorable14 (53.8%)
Molecular genetics
  Positive FLT39 (34.6%)
  Positive CD1178 (30.8%)
  Positive NPM18 (30.8%)

 

↓  Table 4. Differential Expression of CD244 and CD196 on CD3CD16dimCD56bright NK Cells Between Patients and Controls
 
CD3CD16dimCD56bright subpopulationsGroupMean% ± SDP-value
Data are expressed as mean % ± SD and analyzed by Mann–Whitney test. P ≤ 0.05 is significant.
CD3CD16dimCD56brightPatients1.1 ± 2.10.6
Controls0.9 ± 0.4
CD3CD16dimCD56brightCD244+CD196+Patients26.7 ± 25.20.016
Controls12.2 ± 11.3
CD3CD16dimCD56brightCD244+CD196Patients38.4 ± 28.8< 0.001
Controls80.3 ± 8.2
CD3CD16dimCD56brightCD244CD196Patients0.09 ± 0.40.4
Controls0.01 ± 0.0
CD3CD16dimCD56brightCD244CD196+Patients0.4 ± 1.30.9
Controls0.3 ± 1.1

 

↓  Table 5. Differential Expression of CD244 and CD196 on CD3CD16dimCD56dim NK Cells Between Patients and Controls
 
CD3CD16dimCD56dim subpopulationsGroupMean % ± SDP-value
Data are expressed as mean % ± SD and analyzed by Mann–Whitney test. P ≤ 0.05 is significant.
CD3CD16dimCD56dimPatients22.02 ± 13.8< 0.001
Controls5.7 ± 2.6
CD3CD16dimCD56dimCD244+CD196+Patients33.1 ± 11.6< 0.001
Controls18.4 ± 7.2
CD3CD16dimCD56dimCD244+CD196Patients46.6 ± 19.00.3
Controls54.4 ± 18.2
CD3CD16dimCD56dimCD244CD196+Patients12.6 ± 11.60.2
Controls16.0 ± 3.7
CD3CD16dimCD56dimCD244CD196Patients7.7 ± 7.2< 0.001
Controls1.5 ± 1.5

 

↓  Table 6. Type of Chemotherapy Received and Responses
 
TypeDescriptive
Data are expressed as numbers and percentages. Ara C: cytarabine; ATRA: all-trans retinoic acid.
Chemotherapy
  3+7 regimen16 (61.5%)
  Low-dose Ara C9 (34.6%)
  ATRA + low-dose Ara C1 (3.8%)
Response
  Remission17 (65.4%)
  No remission9 (34.6%)

 

↓  Table 7. Differential Expression of Immune Cells According to Risk Groups
 
Immune cellsMean ± SDP-value
Data are expressed as mean ± SD and analyzed by Robust tests. P ≤ 0.05 is significant.
CD3+CD16+CD56+CD244CD196 NKT
  Low risk1.2 ± 0.90.05
  Intermediate risk0.42 ± 0.8
  High risk0.42 ± 0.5
CD3 NK
  Low risk32.8 ± 3.50.013
  Intermediate risk36.5 ± 9.3
  High risk64.8 ± 25.0
CD3CD16brightCD56dim
  Low risk12.4 ± 9.80.024
  Intermediate risk10.4 ± 6.2
  High risk4.6 ± 2.7
CD3CD16brightCD56bright
  Low risk31.8 ± 11.40.019
  Intermediate risk35.1 ± 13.5
  High risk50.2 ± 14.0
CD3CD16dimCD56dim
  Low risk30.4 ± 14.30.005
  Intermediate risk24.0 ± 12.7
  High risk10.4 ± 3.7
CD3CD16+CD56CD244+CD196
  Low risk43.9 ± 13.60.047
  Intermediate risk33.1 ± 12.3
  High risk40.14 ± 18.6
CD3CD16CD56+CD244CD196
  Low risk9.5 ± 5.50.046
  Intermediate risk19.8 ± 11.6
  High risk12.5 ± 6.7