Journal of Hematology, ISSN 1927-1212 print, 1927-1220 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, J Hematol and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website https://jh.elmerpub.com

Original Article

Volume 000, Number 000, July 2025, pages 000-000


Does Time Matter From Diagnosis to Induction in Acute Myeloid Leukemia?

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall survival according TDT. TDT: timing from diagnosis to treatment.
Figure 2.
Figure 2. Forest plot of adjusted hazard ratios and 95% confidence interval for each predictor.

Tables

Table 1. Descriptive Characteristics of Patients and Comparison of TDT
 
Characteristics1 to 5 days (n = 130)6 to 10 days (n = 30)11+ days (n = 27)P-valuesTotal
*Statistical significance (P < 0.05). AML: acute myeloid leukemia; ANC: absolute neutrophil count; ELN: European LeukemiaNet; Hb: hemoglobin; NS: not statistically significant; SD: standard deviation; TDT: timing from diagnosis to treatment; WBC: white blood cell.
Age (years), mean (SD)61.9 (16.3)63.3 (15.0)71.2 (11.3)
Age (years), n (%)
  Under 60 years53 (40.8%)9 (30.0%)2 (7.4%)< 0.05*64
  60+ years77 (59.2%)21 (70.0%)25 (92.6%)123
Sex, n (%)
  Male63 (48.5%)15 (50.0%)16 (59.3%)NS94
  Female67 (51.5%)15 (50.0%)11 (40.7%)93
Race, n (%)
  White106 (92.2%)24 (88.9%)24 (88.9%)NS154
  Black4 (3.5%)2 (7.4%)1 (3.7%)7
  Asian2 (1.7%)0 (0%)0 (0%)2
  Other3 (2.6%)1 (3.7%)2 (7.4%)6
Lab parameters at diagnosis, median (range)
  WBC (× 103/µL)20.2 (0.4 - 397.8)4.4 (0.5 - 98.4)3.3 (0.4 - 800.0)NS
  ANC (µL)1125 (0 - 51,700)380 (0 - 5,490)600 (1 - 7,230)
  Hb (g/dL)8.3 (3.4 - 14.8)8.7 (4.4 - 13.8)8.1 (5.3 - 13.7)
  Platelets (× 103/µL)56 (5 - 367)52 (5 - 633)69 (16 - 538)
  Peripheral blood blast (%)38.0% (0 - 99.0)5.5% (0 - 92.5)4.5% (0 - 86)
  Bone marrow blasts (%)56.4% (0 - 99.0)31.4% (1.5 - 96.2)30.2% (7.0 - 80.0)
WBC > 50 (× 103/µL)4352
ELN 2022 risk stratification
  Favorable28 (22.8%)6 (20.7%)3 (11.5%)0.30537
  Intermediate50 (40.7%)8 (27.6%)9 (34.6%)67
  Adverse45 (36.6%)15 (51.7%)14 (53.9%)74
Secondary AML status
  De novo96 (71.6%)22 (16.4%)16 (11.9%)134
Mutations at diagnosisNS
  CBF6 (4.8%)4 (13.3%)1 (4.0%)11
  NPM149 (38.0%)6 (20.0%)3 (11.1%)58
  CEBPA9 (7.0%)3 (10.0%)1 (3.7%)13
  FLT3-ITD34 (26.4%)2 (6.7%)1 (3.7%)37
  FLT3-TKI4 (3.1%)1 (3.3%)1 (3.7%)6
  KMT2A2 (1.6%)0 (0%)0 (0%)2
  TP537 (5.4%)4 (13.3%)4 (15.4%)15

 

Table 2. Overall Survival in Months by Time to Induction for All Patients
 
Time to inductionMean (SD)
SD: standard deviation.
1 to 5 days (n = 130)20.5 (26.6)
6 to 10 days (n = 30)18.0 (21.4)
11+ days (n = 27)10.4 (11.2)

 

Table 3. HR for Overall Survival vs. Time to Induction
 
Time to inductionHR95% CI
CI: confidence interval; HR: hazard ratio.
1 to 5 days vs. 11+ days0.5670.325 - 0.989
1 to 5 days vs. 6 to 10 days1.0720.577 - 1.992
11+ days vs. 6 to 10 days1.7800.839 - 3.773

 

Table 4. Reasons for Delay in Initiating Chemotherapy 11+ Days After Diagnosis
 
Reasons for delayn = 27 (%)
NGS: next-generation sequencing.
Waiting for NGS/molecular results11 (41%)
Active infection or hemodynamic instability7 (26%)
Waiting for patient’s decision regarding treatment7 (26%)
No clear reason identified2 (7%)

 

Table 5. aORs for Overall Survival vs. Predictors
 
PredictorsaHR95% CI
aHR: adjusted hazard ratio; CI: confidence interval; ELN: European LeukemiaNet.
Time to induction
  11+ days vs. 6 - 10 days1.3980.624 - 3.223
  1 - 5 days vs. 6 - 10 days1.3900.740 - 2.853
  1 - 5 days vs. 11+ days0.9940.546 - 1.904
Chemotherapy intensity
  Intensive vs. non-intensive0.6270.370 - 1.056
Age
  < 60 years vs. ≥ 60 years0.6340.347 - 1.124
Year of diagnosis
  2020 forward vs. before 20150.3950.203 - 0.802
  2015 to 2020 vs. before 20150.8520.455 - 1.674
  2015 to 2020 vs. 2020 forward2.1571.311 - 3.575
ELN status
  Intermediate vs. adverse0.5140.314 - 0.829
  Favorable vs. adverse0.1440.054 - 0.319
  Favorable vs. intermediate0.2790.103 - 0.642

 

Table 6. Early Death by Time to Induction for AML
 
Early death1 to 5 days6 to 10 days11+ daysTotal
AML: acute myeloid leukemia.
Death after 90 days43 (66.2%)9 (13.9%)13 (20.0%)65
Death within 30 days13 (100%)0 (0%)0 (0%)13
Death within 90 days6 (50.0%)3 (25.0%)3 (25.0%)12

 

Table 7. Clinical Outcomes Based on TDT Groups
 
Characteristics1 to 5 days (n = 130)6 to 10 days (n = 30)11+ days (n = 27)P-valuesaTotal
*Statistical significance (P < 0.05). aFisher’s exact test was used for platelet recovery days due to low sample size. SD: standard deviation; TDT: timing from diagnosis to treatment.
Time to best response (days), mean (SD)35.3 (10.5)35.5 (10.2)34.3 (11.4)
Chemotherapy intensity, n (%)
  Non-intensive38 (29.2%)14 (46.7%)19 (70.4%)P < 0.05*71
  Intensive92 (70.8%)16 (53.3%)8 (29.6%)116
Remission status, n (%)
  Complete remission90 (72.6%)21 (75.0%)10 (45.5%)P < 0.05*121
  No response34 (27.4%)7 (25.0%)12 (54.6%)53
Platelet recovery (days), mean (SD)27.4 (20.9)25.3 (10.1)27.4 (23.3)
Platelet recovery, n (%)
  1 to 28 days84 (67.2%)18 (64.3%)11 (50.0%)0.481a113
  29+ days24 (19.2%)6 (21.4%)5 (22.73%)35
  No recovery17 (13.6%)4 (14.3%)6 (27.3%)27
Neutrophil recovery (days), mean (SD)30.8 (14.6)29.7 (10.5)26.7 (14.1)
Neutrophil recovery
  No recovery22 (18.2%)4 (14.3%)6 (33.3%)0.24232
  Recovery99 (81.8%)24 (85.7%)12 (66.7%)135
Transplant
  No transplant59 (63.4%)19 (20.4%)15 (16.1%)No transplant
  Allogeneic stem cell transplant40 (75%)7 (13%)6 (11%)Allogeneic stem cell transplant